The Last Vaudevillian

Entries

What Goes Around Comes Around

posted Saturday, 7 June 2008

Think of everything being different as the only thing that has changed and you will have a pretty good reading of this time we live in. Every time has its own story to tell; it has always been so. There are all sorts of claims as to what the oldest profession is, but storytelling is certainly in the running.The story's longevity can be checked off to a quality that would be counter intuitive to many a park bench psuedo-philosopher today: the core story never changes. Learn the core story and you will forever be a master at it in any time and place. The only thing up for debate will be those pesky details. Here is what I think the core American political story has always been and will always be: he who makes the best case for empowering people to meet the challenges of the time wins. Period. As my mother liked to say, "The proof is in the pudding."

I think of my coming of age as that time and place when I turned 16 and headed off for New York to play my cornet in '31. The business man had been king for so long he had no idea that his time had come and gone. The last thing he could imagine was that America would be so full hardy as to trust a bunch of wacko, we are all in it together, nutcases with the helm. In '32 when the great FDR took hold of that helm they were saying that it was a flash in the pan madness that level headed Americans would get over. Kind of like what the social tight asses of the 20's said about Louis, the 30's said about Bing, the 40's said about Frank, the fifties said about Elvis and the sixties said about The Beatles. Yes sir, just a momentary madness as an interlude between business as usual.

Well that temporary madness lasted with a few minor interludes otherwise between '32 and '68. My daughter was 18 and given her temperament understood what was coming. My son was 16, and if in a few years he would be gone in Vietnam, his temperament would have never allowed him to admit that the age that had shaped him and given him his sense of himself was coming to an end. I don't remember when I came to believe it, but I also thought that by '68 it had turned into something other than the empowerment that a great age depends upon.

I remember reading a book, something about the coming depression, by that Krugman fellah who writes for the times. He almost off the cuff said something that wraps this whole thing up. He said something to the affect that by 1980, it was economic man who was making the case for the means of an individual to get ahead; that we had left the age of social empowerment and entered the age of economic empowerment. I believe he hit it right on the nose. Whether a black man could raise himself up or a woman could get a break, simply would not do compared to the notion that a rebirth of a dynamic marketplace could float everybody's boat. It was a powerful argument, and its time had come again.

It is now forty years later from that great crackup in '68 when Martin Luther King and that man who was beginning to be seen then and has been frozen in time as embodying such possibilities, RFK, were lost to bullets. Some have spent the last forty years bemoaning those lost possibilities. Bemoaning empowers nobody, and on this day a woman who could very easily, and many would say rightfully, have simply bemoaned her fate, rose to the occasion and to the needs of the time, and to a correct understanding that we stand at the beginning not at the end. Hillary's speech would have been an extraordinary speech on any occasion, but on this one, she wisely gave voice not to what is, but to what might be if we only reach out and grasp it.

My daughter is no liberal, and may not even welcome the age that we stand at the cusp of, but she was in tears listening. You see there are some things that overwhelm even who we think we are. She knows a new age is upon us. This will be my last one, but I will be ever grateful for having witnessed its birth. Let us be wise stewards of it. For we who welcome it and gladly kissoff that which is receding into history should remember what the jesters told the victorious generals: all glory is fleeting. Put another way, that which goes around comes around.

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit

AddThis Social Bookmark Button




1. Donna left...
Sunday, 8 June 2008 10:29 am

Hi Frankie, You've been busy this morning and I've enjoyed your posts. Like you, I think Hillary's speech was worth the wait. It made me proud and I'm in awe and admiration of her. I don't know how she managed these last few weeks with such grace and composure. All along I've said I could vote for either one in November but, with her withdrawal, I find myself feeling sad and disappointed. I feel like we (me, women, our society) just lost something that would have been very good and meaningful to us. I will certainly still vote for Obama in November, but I think we need BOTH her "experience", level-headedness, determination, etc. as well as Barack's hopefulness and inspiration. I was hoping for the dream ticket with her at the top (for 8 years, then Obama). After the shame and debacle for this administration, we need the strengths of both (and I'm not sure the reverse dream ticket will take advantage of Hillary's strengths) - one without the other is not likely to accomplish as much. My first hope for Obama is that he will surround himself with the right people, including Hillary, to be able to do more than anyone ever imagined. He will need all the help he can get and he certainly has my good wishes.

I'm glad your daughter was touched by her speech and I hope some of those who have expressed so much contempt for the Clintons (and there are a lot in this area.....it was a woman here who referred to her as "the Bitch" at a McCain campaign stop that was televised worldwide!) might now have a small bit of respect. In any case, I hope the democrats can grasp the importance of this moment, leave partanship behind and move to do what is needed for the country. Donna


2. Frankie Houlihan left...
Tuesday, 10 June 2008 9:04 am

I remember my father once saying to me concerning people who just don't understand our act. He told me that there will always be people who don't understand something, hell, I don't understand them. Then he leaned in and whispered so my mother woudn't hear, "screw them." I also recall the famous Old Joe Kennedy quote concerning the money he handed out in West Virginia, putting half the local Democratic pols on the payroll, when JFK needed to beat Humphrey there: "I don't mind paying for a win, but I will be damn if I going to pay for a landslide." Put another way, we are too often disappointed by not getting everything when in fact there is no particular reason to be unhappy about what we in fact got.

Someone was going to be very unhappy this time around. Both blacks and women felt entitled. My sympathies are with women who felt how this played out was an indication that in some way blacks have actually made the greater progress. Some of what took place in terms of how media and people handled this had to do with personality, and maybe the idea that Hillary really did make more mistakes in how her campaign was handled, but some of it can rightfully be pointed out as blacks maybe having made more progress in terms of demanding upfront respect than women have made. That is an interesting thing if it is true because that would not have been my guess as to how it would play out.

How Barack acted and what he said was rarely characterized in the context of his being black, where virtually every nuance of Hillary's dress, speach, body language, you name it, was put under the microscope of a woman not having the audacity of hope, but the audacity to run for president. It was often times not a pretty picture.

With that said, Obama ran the better campaign and didn't have to deal with the compexity of Mister Bill.

This could go on and on and end up sounding like another yak, yak, yakker. But you might want to consider two points from my point of view that may at first blush seem contradictory but they are not: women made progress, while at the same time were publically exposed to just how much they have not won the battle of how they can be baltantly talked about in public in a manner that is no longer considered politic for blacks.